|
|
 This site is dedicated to
frank and fearless reporting and commenting to expose the Islamic
Jihad
|
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
|
|
Sunni Insurgency in Iraq -
The unseen Iranian Shiite Connection
Inspite of the increasing finds of Weapons of Iranian markings in
terrorist attacks in Iraq many of us fail to see the undercurrents to
the increasing disturbances in Iraq. Which nation would stand to gain
if Iraq remains destablized? Which nation benefits if our liberation
of Iraq fails to produce a stable democracy? Obviously Iran (and
Syria). While Syria is a straight suspect in supporting the smaller
Ba'athist element of the Iraqi insurgency, Iran's role is more
murkier and hard to establish. The Mullahs of Iran knew quite well
all along that after Iraq's liberation, it would be Iran's turn -
sooner or later. Now with Iraq having had its first general election,
with the second one coming up soon and the Constitution being on the
drawing board, Iraq could through it convulsions become a democracy
of sorts, if not in the Jeffersonian sense! This makes Iranian
Mullohcracy very vulnerable. The Iranian desperation is reflected in
the Iranian Mullah Administration's having managed to rig the recent
elections to put their man Ahmedinejad
in the President's office. The Mullahs know their time is running
out. Hence while they openly reach out to the Shiite-led Iraqi
administration, welcoming the Iraqi Prime Minister in Tehran, but
secretly they supply arms and ammunition to the Sunni insurgency, not
directly but through their Syrian intermediaries. The Iranian
desperation is further evidenced in their restarting uranium
enrichment, brushing aside the efforts of the European appeasers to
mollify and cuddle the abrasive Mullahs. Due to their breaking of the
seals and the begnning of enrichment at the Isfahan nuclear facility,
the Iranian case will soon be referred to the UN. And with Bolton as
the outspoken American representative at the UN, we can rest assured
that the logical build-up to the military option would be a matter of
months. To add to the Mullah's discomfiture, President Bush has made
it clear enough that all options are on the table and the military
option is not ruled out.
Read this story....
|
|
|
|
|
General Musharraf -
Friend or Foe?
Many of us who are applauding President Musharraf today for
cracking down on terrorists have missed the fine print in his
speeches
where he has said; "Pakistan Islam ka Killa Hai." "Pakistan is the
bastion of Islam." And "Agar Islam koh Mazboot banana hai, toh hame
Pakistan koh mazboot banana chahiye." "If we want to strengthen
Islam, then we will have to strengthen Pakistan." "Gaye kuch saalon
mein hamene, zyada Musalmaanon koh Kafir banaya hian, aur kam Kafiron
koh Musalmaan." "In the last few years we have converted more Muslims
into Kafirs (non-Muslims) and less Kafirs into Muslims." All these
phrases are extracted from the President's address. The entire
International media has missed the impact of these statements that
are hidden in a mass of messages that otherwise seem to be calling
for a Muslim Reformation.
But we can ignore the implications of these thoughts of President
Musharraf only at our peril. Had President Bush said that "America is
the bastion of Christianity." And "If we want to strengthen
Christianity, then we ought to strengthen America." And further
that "In the last few years we have converted more Christians into
pagans and less pagans into Christians." If President had said
something like this in an address to the American nation, then how
would the global media would have reacted. Their reaction to his
singular use of the word "Crusade" is one example of the kind of
reaction we could have expected. Even a more direct statement by the
Italian Prime Minister that Christian civilization is superior to the
Islamic one drew sharp retorts from the media. Then how is it that
the media is totally silent now?
And is it that President Musharraf wants to strengthen Islam in due
course? This is what Osama Bin Laden also wants! What has been the
track record of Islam in the last 14 centuries and what could be the
implication of strengthening Islam for the future? Why does President
Musharraf have to refer to non-Muslims using the derogatory
term "Kafir" (Infidel)? And does he want more non-Muslims to be
converted to being Muslims? Why does he look upon Pakistan to be
bastion of Islam and why does he want to strengthen Islam by
strengthening Pakistan? All this is very disturbing for the future,
if President Musharraf is allowed to realize his dream, since it does
not seem far removed from Osama's world view! The hidden message in
President Musharraf 's speech deserves to be taken note of.
He also compared Pakistan's alliance with America as similar to
the Treaty of Hudaibiya
signed by the prophet of Islam with the non-Muslim Arabs, whom he was
to trick later with the terms of the treaty. This also gives us a
telling insight into the mind of "His Excellency" General President
Pervez Musharraf as to the deception (Taqqiya) he has so far
successfully employed against us.
Read this story....
|
Exclusive Coverage
What does it
take to win a war against theology-inspired terror?
The Root
causes of Muslim Alienation and of 9/11, 3/11, 7/7
What makes
Muslims glorify murder and revenge?
The cracks
and contradictions within the Communist-Islamist Alliance
The real Muslim
mind revealed by an Ex-Muslim
Strategy to
break the Islamist-Communist Alliance
Logic behind
Iran's Mullahs' Desperation to get Nuclear Weapons.
Putin's romance with
Palestinians, Iranians and Syrians - Shades of
Hitler-Stalin (Ribbentrop-Molotov) Pact of 1939?
Iran's Duplicity in
building Nuclear weapons under the cloak of Energy
Requirements recalls Hitler's duplicity of building Luftwaffe using
Flying Clubs
Vietnam War and
the War on Terror - similarities and differences
|
|
