Site Motto

This is a non-commercial site brought to you with the aim of creating awareness about the challenge of terrorism. Daily News on the War on the Jihad.

Breaking News

Tuesday, september 27, 2005

The lessons we need to learn from the early victories against Muslims if we are to destroy Islamic threat forever

There were some very significant victories that the Persians and Romans scored against the invading Muslims at the very outset of the Jihad. But both the Romans and Persian failed to use these early gains against the Muslims to destroy the Muslim threat once and forever. The reasons was that both the Romans and Persians looked upon the Arab Muslims as just another invader, who would not re- attack when they were once defeated. The Romans and Persians had waged war on each other for centuries, but had never thought of totally destroying each other. The object of warfare was to annex land and expand their empires.

Neither the Persians nor aimed at destroying the cultural and national identities of each other and subsuming the others identity into their own. But this precisely was the aim of the Arab Muslims and so for the Muslims a defeat was only a blip on the radar, to be forgotten and to resume warfare once again till a victory was finally secured over the adversary and after that victory, the adversary was to be subsumed under Islam, their adversaries cultural and national identity was to be totally smothered with the mortal throttling grip of Islam.

Today the Muslims try to deflect the American effort at war, by many their own time honored deceptive tactics based on their mean psychology of deceit. They say that the 9/11 attacks were the handiwork of the Jews (sic). They say that they are fighting in self- defiance and so they kill innocent civilians, women and children (at Beslan). This kind of deceit has been used by the Muslims in all their encounters al through the 1400 years of their existence. This base and mean mentality of the Muslims will have to borne in mind and countered if we are to finally defeat the Muslim today and to permanently end the menace of Islam. History is replete with such examples of the Muslims having deceived their adversaries and having secured a victory through subterfuge.

calguard

_____________________

Lessons from the Battle of the Bridge (Al Jisr) - 14 A.H. 636 C.E.

At one such major clash during the initial Muslim attacks on Persia, which is known as the Battle of the Bridge between the Persians and the Arab Muslim, the Persians used elephants, which were new for the denizens of the desert the Bedouin Arab Muslims. At the battle of the Bridge (the Battle of Al Jisr in Arab chronicles), the Persians used their elephants to trample over the Arab attacker. They even trampled the Arab general, due to which there was panic among the Arab army which stared fleeing in chaos. The Persians chased the Arabs up to the Bridge on the Tigris river, which then marked the boundary between the Persian empire and the domain of the Arabs. The Persians stopped at the bridge and did not chase the Arabs beyond it, they did not follow the Arabs into the Arabian desert and did not go right up to Mecca to destroy the origins of the Arab Muslim threat. Thus the Persians wasted an opportunity to utterly defeat the Muslims by going right into Arabia and hunting down the Muslim Arabs in their homeland and slaughtering them in the same manner in which the Arab Muslim slaughtered all their adversaries and speaking to the Muslims in the only language they understand that of blood and death. This the Persian did, since that was how battles had been fought from time immemorial till the beastly Muslim came on the scene. Alexander did not slaughter his adversaries, nor did he forcibly convert them to Greeks. Not did the Romans do this nor did the Byzantines , so nor did the Persians.

The Persians and the Byzantines had been fighting till before the Arab Muslims invaded both their empires, but neither the Persians nor the Byzantines exterminate each other's armies, and less so each other's civilian population. With the Arabs it was going to be different.

With the Arab Muslims it was going to be different. They were to slaughter all defeated armies to the last man, and then terrorize the civilian population to embrace Islam. Had the Persian known this and had they decided to respond in the same way, they should have slaughtered he entire fleeing Arab army a Battle of Al Jisr (Battle of the Bridge) and then went into nook and cranny of Arabia (as Mohammed had done) to convert the newly converted Arab Muslims to any religion, except the vicious creed of Islam. The Persians cannot be blamed for not doing this, since they did not know the kind of enemy that they were facing, so they allowed the retreating army to flee. An army that was to come back again to slaughter the entire Persian army Qadissiyah and in all other battles where the Arab Muslim faced the Persians and all other adversaries, after which they were to terrorize the civilian population to embrace Islam.

The Persians can be forgiven for not having done that to the Muslims, but today when we know what Islam is al about and we have the track record for Islam, it is foolish and suicidal not to do this by this we mean to not just defeat Islam on h battlefield, but to forcibly convert the Muslims to any other religion, but their accursed creed of Islam.

This is the lesson of the battle of Al Jisr (The battle of the Bridge). An opportunity to this was lost by the Franks at the Battle of Poitiers in 732, by the Austrians and Poles at the battle of Vienna in 1685 by the Hindus at the Battle of Tarain in 1191 at the Battle of the Bridge by the Persians in 634, and more recently at the six day war in 1967 by the Israelis; and countless other battles at which the victorious non-Muslims allowed to Muslims to retreat unmolested. A costly mistake that came back to haunt humankind time and again the last time spectacularly on 9/11 which is bound to repeat itself over and over again till the world decided that enough is enough and put an final end to the menace called Islam.

Lessons from the Battle of Ghadasia (Cadesia or Quadsiyyah) with the Persians (15 A.H., 637 C.E.)

At this seminal battle fought over four days. The Persians were led by a capable general named Rustam Farrokhzad (Farokh Hormazd), and only the foul tactics of Saad-Ibn-Waqas, the Arab Muslim commander could bring defeat and death to Rustam and the Persian army. Under Saad-ibn-Waqas, the Muslims very effectively used the tactic of luring the Arab contingent to defect from the Persian army, join the Arab Muslims and betray their non-Muslim Zoroastrian paymasters. This way the Muslims could get to know the weaknesses of the Persian army. One of these was the tactic of cutting the girdles of the Howdas (seats) of those who were riding the elephants, so that they would fall and thus the elephant would become directionless. The elephants played havoc on t beginning of the first day of the battle.

But when the Arab contingent who had defected, betrayed their Persian paymasters and told the Arab Muslims to cut the girdles of the elephants, the elephants became useless. This was one way the Muslims could defeat their more superior adversary. The second tactic told by the defectors was to blind the elephants in one eye only, so that they would lose direction and flee away from the direction, of its attackers. When this was done, the elephants turned around and broke through the Persian ranks, causing disorder in the Persian army and opened up passages for the Muslims to advance into the Persian ranks. This was the second tactic which the defectors told the Arab Muslims to use, due to which the tide of the battle turned in favor of the Muslim - so much for Allah giving them victory. The Arabs and Persian had agreed at the beginning of the battle not fight after sundown, but when the tide of the battle began to turn against the Persians on the third day of the battle, the Arabs attacked the Persian all through the night, shouting Allah-o-Akbar. This was the Night of Clangor, which sealed the fate of the battle in favor of the deceitful and barbaric Muslim Arabs. The victory was a result of deceit, which he adversaries of the Muslims today need to remember when fighting he Muslims.

Today the Muslims try to deflect the American effort at war, by many such tactics based on their mean psychology of deceit. They say that the 9/11 attacks were the handiwork of the Jews (sic). They say that they are fighting in self- defiance and so they kill innocent civilians, women and children (at Beslan). This kind of deceit has been used by the Muslims in all their encounters al through the 1400 years of their existence. His base and mean mentality of the Muslims will have to borne in mind and countered if we are to finally defeat the Muslim today and to permanently end the menace of Islam.

Story Credits: History of Jihad against the Persians

__________________________________________________

Discuss this article

Google
Search WWW Search waronjihad.org Search historyofjihad.org

______________________________________________________________________ ____________

________________________________________

Send your feedback to:

- The WaronJihad team

______________________________________________

______________________________________________

Letters to the Editor
Read Letters to the Editor

______________________________________________

Free Hit Counter
Thanks for visiting