|
The lessons we need to learn from the early victories against Muslims
if we are to destroy Islamic threat forever
There were some very significant victories that the Persians and
Romans scored against the invading Muslims at the very outset of the
Jihad. But both the Romans and Persian failed to use these early
gains against the Muslims to destroy the Muslim threat once and
forever. The reasons was that both the Romans and Persians looked
upon the Arab Muslims as just another invader, who would not re-
attack when they were once defeated. The Romans and Persians had
waged war on each other for centuries, but had never thought of
totally destroying each other. The object of warfare was to annex
land and expand their empires. Neither the Persians nor aimed at
destroying the cultural and national identities of each other and
subsuming the others identity into their own. But this precisely was
the aim of the Arab Muslims and so for the Muslims a defeat was only
a blip on the radar, to be forgotten and to resume warfare once again
till a victory was finally secured over the adversary and after that
victory, the adversary was to be subsumed under Islam, their
adversaries cultural and national identity was to be totally
smothered with the mortal throttling grip of Islam.
Today the Muslims try to deflect the American effort at war, by
many their own time honored deceptive tactics based on their mean
psychology of deceit. They say that the 9/11 attacks were the
handiwork of the Jews (sic). They say that they are fighting in self-
defiance and so they kill innocent civilians, women and children (at
Beslan). This kind of deceit has been used by the Muslims in all
their encounters al through the 1400 years of their existence. This
base and mean mentality of the Muslims will have to borne in mind and
countered if we are to finally defeat the Muslim today and to
permanently end the menace of Islam. History is replete with such
examples of the Muslims having deceived their adversaries and having
secured a victory through subterfuge.
calguard _____________________
Lessons from the Battle of the Bridge (Al Jisr) - 14 A.H. 636
C.E.
At one such major clash during the initial Muslim attacks on Persia,
which is known as the Battle of the Bridge between the Persians and
the Arab Muslim, the Persians used elephants, which were new for the
denizens of the desert the Bedouin Arab Muslims. At the battle of the
Bridge (the Battle of Al Jisr in Arab chronicles), the Persians used
their elephants to trample over the Arab attacker. They even trampled
the Arab general, due to which there was panic among the Arab army
which stared fleeing in chaos. The Persians chased the Arabs up to
the Bridge on the Tigris river, which then marked the boundary
between the Persian empire and the domain of the Arabs. The Persians
stopped at the bridge and did not chase the Arabs beyond it, they did
not follow the Arabs into the Arabian desert and did not go right up
to Mecca to destroy the origins of the Arab Muslim threat. Thus the
Persians wasted an opportunity to utterly defeat the Muslims by going
right into Arabia and hunting down the Muslim Arabs in their homeland
and slaughtering them in the same manner in which the Arab Muslim
slaughtered all their adversaries and speaking to the Muslims in the
only language they understand – that of blood and death. This the
Persian did, since that was how battles had been fought from time
immemorial till the beastly Muslim came on the scene. Alexander did
not slaughter his adversaries, nor did he forcibly convert them to
Greeks. Not did the Romans do this nor did the Byzantines , so nor
did the Persians. The Persians and the Byzantines had been
fighting till before the Arab Muslims invaded both their empires, but
neither the Persians nor the Byzantines exterminate each other's
armies, and less so each other's civilian population. With the Arabs
it was going to be different. With the Arab Muslims it was going
to be different. They were to slaughter all defeated armies to the
last man, and then terrorize the civilian population to embrace
Islam. Had the Persian known this and had they decided to respond in
the same way, they should have slaughtered he entire fleeing Arab
army a Battle of Al Jisr (Battle of the Bridge) and then went into
nook and cranny of Arabia (as Mohammed had done) to convert the newly
converted Arab Muslims to any religion, except the vicious creed of
Islam. The Persians cannot be blamed for not doing this, since they
did not know the kind of enemy that they were facing, so they allowed
the retreating army to flee. An army that was to come back again to
slaughter the entire Persian army Qadissiyah and in all other battles
where the Arab Muslim faced the Persians and all other adversaries,
after which they were to terrorize the civilian population to embrace
Islam. The Persians can be forgiven for not having done that to
the Muslims, but today when we know what Islam is al about and we
have the track record for Islam, it is foolish and suicidal not to do
this by this we mean to not just defeat Islam on h battlefield, but
to forcibly convert the Muslims to any other religion, but their
accursed creed of Islam. This is the lesson of the battle of Al
Jisr (The battle of the Bridge). An opportunity to this was lost by
the Franks at the Battle of Poitiers in 732, by the Austrians and
Poles at the battle of Vienna in 1685 by the Hindus at the Battle of
Tarain in 1191 at the Battle of the Bridge by the Persians in 634,
and more recently at the six day war in 1967 by the Israelis; and
countless other battles at which the victorious non-Muslims allowed
to Muslims to retreat unmolested. A costly mistake that came back to
haunt humankind time and again the last time spectacularly on 9/11
which is bound to repeat itself over and over again till the world
decided that enough is enough and put an final end to the menace
called Islam.
Lessons from the Battle of Ghadasia (Cadesia or Quadsiyyah) with the
Persians (15 A.H., 637 C.E.)
At this seminal battle fought over four days. The Persians were led
by a capable general named Rustam Farrokhzad (Farokh Hormazd), and
only the foul tactics of Saad-Ibn-Waqas, the Arab Muslim commander
could bring defeat and death to Rustam and the Persian army. Under
Saad-ibn-Waqas, the Muslims very effectively used the tactic of
luring the Arab contingent to defect from the Persian army, join the
Arab Muslims and betray their non-Muslim Zoroastrian paymasters. This
way the Muslims could get to know the weaknesses of the Persian army.
One of these was the tactic of cutting the girdles of the Howdas
(seats) of those who were riding the elephants, so that they would
fall and thus the elephant would become directionless. The elephants
played havoc on t beginning of the first day of the battle. But
when the Arab contingent who had defected, betrayed their Persian
paymasters and told the Arab Muslims to cut the girdles of the
elephants, the elephants became useless. This was one way the Muslims
could defeat their more superior adversary. The second tactic told by
the defectors was to blind the elephants in one eye only, so that
they would lose direction and flee away from the direction, of its
attackers. When this was done, the elephants turned around and broke
through the Persian ranks, causing disorder in the Persian army and
opened up passages for the Muslims to advance into the Persian ranks.
This was the second tactic which the defectors told the Arab Muslims
to use, due to which the tide of the battle turned in favor of the
Muslim - so much for Allah giving them victory. The Arabs and Persian
had agreed at the beginning of the battle not fight after sundown,
but when the tide of the battle began to turn against the Persians on
the third day of the battle, the Arabs attacked the Persian all
through the night, shouting Allah-o-Akbar. This was the Night of
Clangor, which sealed the fate of the battle in favor of the
deceitful and barbaric Muslim Arabs. The victory was a result of
deceit, which he adversaries of the Muslims today need to remember
when fighting he Muslims. Today the Muslims try to deflect the
American effort at war, by many such tactics based on their mean
psychology of deceit. They say that the 9/11 attacks were the
handiwork of the Jews (sic). They say that they are fighting in self-
defiance and so they kill innocent civilians, women and children (at
Beslan). This kind of deceit has been used by the Muslims in all
their encounters al through the 1400 years of their existence. His
base and mean mentality of the Muslims will have to borne in mind and
countered if we are to finally defeat the Muslim today and to
permanently end the menace of Islam.
Story Credits: History of Jihad against
the Persians
__________________________________________________
Discuss this
article
|
