|
|
 This site is dedicated to
frank and fearless reporting and commenting to expose the Islamic
Jihad
|
|
|
How much more evidence do
we need that Iran has an advanced secret
weapons program, after the Mullahs' record of having lied over and
over again?
Israel does not want to attack Iran unilaterally, believing instead
that the problem of controlling Iran is an international problem
which should be taken on by the United States and Europe as well. The
time for peaceful change to occur in Iran may have passed, simply
because of our inability to act. The mullahs have put down recent
protests with their typical brutality. The United States and the
world stood by and watched. Now, the State Department is dragging its
heels awarding the $3 million in grants supposedly available to
support dissidents with Iran. John Kerry sympathizers within Foggy
Bottom are winning the day once again.
What we have with the Washington Post article today is a replay of
the "Where's the Weapons of Mass Destruction" argument all over
again. Washington Post staff writer Dafna Linzer wants to make sure
she has launched the first salvo, charging that there's no smoking
gun in Iran either. This shot is taken just to make sure nobody in
the Bush Administration thinks too seriously about keeping the
military option on the table.
The extreme political left in the United States would like nothing
better than an excuse to impeach George Bush, especially after his
recess appointment of John Bolton to be our ambassador to the United
Nations. The next political battleground is over Iran and the
Democrats don't intend to lose, even if America's national security
is put at risk. So, today the Washington Post launched the pre-
emptive attack on Iran, but they focused the fire on the White House,
not the mullahs.
How much more evidence to we need that Iran has an advanced secret
weapons program,after the Mullahs' record of having lied over and
over again?
Read this story....
|
|
|
|
|
The lessons we need to
learn from the early victories against Muslims if we are to destroy
Islamic threat forever
Today the Islamic Terrorists try to deflect the American effort at
war, by many their own time honored deceptive tactics based on their
mean psychology of deceit. They say that the 9/11 attacks were the
handiwork of the Jews (sic). They say that they are fighting in self-
defiance and so they kill innocent civilians, women and children (at
Beslan). This kind of deceit has been used by the Muslims in all
their encounters al through the 1400 years of their existence. This
base and mean mentality of the Muslims will have to borne in mind and
countered if we are to finally defeat the Muslim today and to
permanently end the menace of Islam. History is replete with such
examples of the Muslims having deceived their adversaries and having
secured a victory through subterfuge.
This is evident in one of the first battles of the Islamic Jihad, the
battle of Ghadasia (Cadesia or Quadsiyyah) fought between the
invading Muslims and the defending Persians (15 A.H., 637 C.E.). The
battle was fought over four days. The Persians were led by a capable
general named Rustam-e-Farrokhzad (Farokh Hormazd), and only the foul
tactics of Saad-Ibn-Waqas, the Arab Muslim commander could bring
defeat and death to Rustam and the Persian army. Under Saad-ibn-
Waqas, the Muslims very effectively used the tactic of luring the
Arab contingent to defect from the Persian army, join the Arab
Muslims and betray their non-Muslim Zoroastrian paymasters. This way
the Muslims could get to know the weaknesses of the Persian army. One
of these was the tactic of cutting the girdles of the Howdas (seats)
of those who were riding the elephants, so that they would fall and
thus the elephant would become directionless. The elephants played
havoc on t beginning of the first day of the battle. But when the
Arab contingent who had defected, betrayed their Persian paymasters
and told the Arab Muslims to cut the girdles of the elephants, the
elephants became useless. This was one way the Muslims could defeat
their more superior adversary. The second tactic told by the
defectors was to blind the elephants in one eye only, so that they
would lose direction and flee away from the direction, of its
attackers. When this was done, the elephants turned around and broke
through the Persian ranks, causing disorder in the Persian army and
opened up passages for the Muslims to advance into the Persian ranks.
This was the second tactic which the defectors told the Arab Muslims
to use, due to which the tide of the battle turned in favor of the
Muslim - so much for Allah giving them victory. The Arabs and Persian
had agreed at the beginning of the battle not fight after sundown,
but when the tide of the battle began to turn against the Persians on
the third day of the battle, the Arabs attacked the Persian all
through the night, shouting Allah-o-Akbar. This was the Night of
Clangor, which sealed the fate of the battle in favor of the
deceitful and barbaric Muslim Arabs. The victory was a result of
deceit, which he adversaries of the Muslims today need to remember
when fighting he Muslims.
Read this story....
|
Exclusive Coverage
The effective way of defeating Pre-cultural theology-inspired
Islamic terrorism
Optional Scenarios if the USA does not decimate Mullah Jihadis of
Iran now
What we need to change within us to defeat Islamic Terrorism
Understanding Islamic Terrorism to enable us to destroy it once and
forever
How Iraq can take the
entire Middle East into Apocalypse
Musharraf's
Pakistan -
A friend or a foe?
What does it
take to win a war against theology-inspired terror?
The Root
causes of Muslim Alienation and of 9/11, 3/11, 7/7
What makes
Muslims glorify murder and revenge?
The cracks
and contradictions within the Communist-Islamist Alliance
The real Muslim
mind revealed by an Ex-Muslim
Strategy to
break the Islamist-Communist Alliance
Logic behind
Iran's Mullahs' Desperation to get Nuclear Weapons.
Putin's romance with
Palestinians, Iranians and Syrians - Shades of
Hitler-Stalin (Ribbentrop-Molotov) Pact of 1939?
Iran's Duplicity in
building Nuclear weapons under the cloak of Energy
Requirements recalls Hitler's duplicity of building Luftwaffe using
Flying Clubs
Vietnam War and
the War on Terror - similarities and differences
|
|